Brand Image
Loading ...

What is IPC Section 398?

IPC Section 398 deals with attempting to commit robbery or dacoity while carrying a deadly weapon. Even if the robbery or dacoity is not completed, the law imposes strict punishment when the offender is armed during the attempt. The punishment is imprisonment for not less than 7 years.

Detailed Explanation

IPC Section 398 was part of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and addressed serious offences involving an attempted robbery or attempted dacoity where the accused carried a deadly weapon.

The law focuses on the danger created by the armed attempt itself. The offence may apply even when no property is actually taken.

Under criminal law:

  • Robbery generally involves theft or extortion with force, fear, or violence.
  • Dacoity refers to robbery committed or attempted by five or more persons acting together.

For IPC Section 398 to apply, these elements are generally examined:

  1. There was an attempt to commit robbery or dacoity.
  2. The accused was armed at that time.
  3. The weapon was capable of causing serious injury or death.

The prosecution does not necessarily need to prove that the weapon was actually used. Being armed during the attempt itself becomes legally significant under this section.

Example

Suppose two persons enter a jewellery shop carrying a loaded pistol and threaten staff but are caught before taking anything.

Even though no property was stolen, IPC Section 398 may apply because there was an attempt and the offenders were armed with a deadly weapon.

Important Features of IPC Section 398

PointExplanation
OffenceAttempt to commit robbery or dacoity when armed with deadly weapon
PunishmentImprisonment not less than 7 years
Nature of OffenceCognizable
BailNon-bailable
Trial CourtCourt of Session
RequirementAttempt + possession of deadly weapon

IPC Section 398 vs IPC Section 393

People often confuse IPC Section 398 with IPC Section 393.

SectionSituation
IPC Section 393Attempt to commit robbery
IPC Section 398Attempt to commit robbery or dacoity while armed with deadly weapon

IPC Section 398 carries stricter consequences because of the increased risk to public safety.

Key Points / Important Facts

  • IPC Section 398 applied even if robbery or dacoity was not completed.
  • Carrying a deadly weapon during the attempt is the key factor.
  • Actual injury is not necessary for this section to apply.
  • The punishment starts from 7 years and courts cannot impose a lower sentence under normal circumstances.
  • The offence is treated as serious because of the threat of violence.
  • Investigation usually relies on witness statements, recovery of weapons, CCTV footage, and surrounding circumstances.

Legal Provision or Section

Act: Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section: IPC Section 398 – Attempt to commit robbery or dacoity when armed with deadly weapon.

Legal text of the provision states that where a person attempts robbery or dacoity while armed with a deadly weapon, punishment shall not be less than seven years.

Current Legal Status

The Indian Penal Code, 1860 has been replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 with effect from 1 July 2024.

The subject covered under IPC Section 398 is now substantially reflected under Section 312 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, with no major change in the core legal principle and punishment structure.

Conclusion

IPC Section 398 punished attempts to commit robbery or dacoity where the offender was armed with a deadly weapon. The law treated such conduct seriously because the risk of violence existed even before the crime was completed. After the introduction of BNS, new cases are generally registered under Section 312 BNS, but understanding IPC Section 398 remains important for legal awareness and competitive exams.

Sources & References

Explore Question Categories

Reviewed: Content reviewed for accuracy based on publicly available legal sources and general legal information.
Disclaimer: This website provides general legal information for educational purposes only and does not offer legal advice. Laws vary by country, and readers should consult a qualified legal professional for advice specific to their situation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top