IPC Section 393 deals with the offence of attempt to commit robbery. If a person tries to commit robbery but the robbery is not completed, the person can still be punished under this section. The punishment may extend to 7 years of rigorous imprisonment and fine. Attempt itself is treated as a serious criminal offence under Indian law.
Detailed Explanation
IPC Section 393 was part of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and covered situations where a person attempted to commit robbery but could not complete the act. The law does not require successful robbery for punishment.
Robbery is considered more serious than ordinary theft because it involves force, threat, fear of instant injury, or wrongful restraint.
Under Section 393, once a person takes clear steps toward committing robbery, criminal liability may arise even if property is not actually taken.
For example:
A person stops a bike rider on a road and threatens him with violence to snatch his wallet. Before taking the wallet, police arrive and stop the act. Since there was an attempt to commit robbery, Section 393 IPC may apply.
Courts usually look at facts such as:
- Whether there was intention to commit robbery
- Whether actual steps were taken
- Whether the act moved beyond preparation
Mere planning is generally not enough. There must be an attempt connected with the intended robbery.
| Point | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Offence | Attempt to commit robbery |
| Punishment | Rigorous imprisonment up to 7 years and fine |
| Nature of Offence | Cognizable |
| Bail | Non-bailable |
| Trial Court | Magistrate of First Class |
| Requirement | Intention and attempt toward robbery |
Attempt and preparation are different concepts in criminal law.
Preparation means making arrangements.
Attempt means beginning execution of the offence.
Section 393 applies after preparation turns into an actual attempt.
Key Points / Important Facts
- IPC Section 393 punished attempt to commit robbery.
- Robbery need not be completed for punishment.
- The offence was cognizable.
- The offence was generally treated as non-bailable.
- Punishment could extend to 7 years and fine.
- Police and courts examine conduct, intention, and surrounding facts.
- Evidence such as witness statements, CCTV footage, recovery, and circumstances may become important.
Legal Provision or Section
Act: Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section: IPC Section 393 – Attempt to Commit Robbery
Provision:
“Whoever attempts to commit robbery shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.”
Current Legal Status
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 has been replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 with effect from 1 July 2024.
The subject of robbery and attempt-related provisions now continues under corresponding provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). New criminal cases are registered under BNS instead of IPC.
Conclusion
IPC Section 393 punished a person for attempting to commit robbery even when the robbery did not succeed. Indian criminal law treats attempted robbery seriously because it threatens personal safety and property. Understanding IPC Section 393 helps citizens distinguish between preparation, attempt, theft, and robbery under criminal law.
Sources & References
Explore Question Categories
Prabh Kalsi provides global legal information and educational content to help readers understand legal concepts, rights, and processes across different countries. With experience in researching legal topics and simplifying complex legal information, he creates easy-to-understand content based on publicly available and trusted sources. This content is intended for informational purposes only.